General Parameter Evaluation Concerning Equipment Configuration for Polar Cruise with Combination of Multiple Methods

WANG Mengmeng; GUO Yunhua; CHENG Baochen; HU Yi; GAO Haibo; ZHANG Jianfeng

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4653.2022.01.010

Navigation of China > 2022 > 45(1): 54-62. > DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4653.2022.01.010

WANG Mengmeng, GUO Yunhua, CHENG Baochen, HU Yi, GAO Haibo, ZHANG Jianfeng. General Parameter Evaluation Concerning Equipment Configuration for Polar Cruise with Combination of Multiple Methods[J]. Navigation of China, 2022, 45(1): 54-62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4653.2022.01.010

Citation:

PDF (903 KB)

General Parameter Evaluation Concerning Equipment Configuration for Polar Cruise with Combination of Multiple Methods

1. Key Laboratory of High Performance Ship Technology, Wuhan 430063, China;
2. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan 430063, China;
3. School of Shipping, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China;
4. China Merchants Heavy Industry (Jiangsu) Co., LTD., Nantong 226100, China

More Information

Received Date: February 19, 2021
Available Online: June 13, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

EWM and AHP are used to calculate the subjective and objective weights of indexes respectively and the results are combined.The equipment selection scheme is evaluated by TOPSIS and Grey Relational Analysis repectively and the results are fused with D-S theory.The sensitivity analysis is performed to prove the advantage in stability of the objective-subjective weight fusing.The preference reversal is examined for an actual case.
- general evaluation of equipment selection scheme,
- combined weight,
- D-S theory,
- evaluation fusing

FullText(HTML)

References (28)

References

[1]	刘瀛昊,佟福山,高良田.基于原型测量的极地航行船舶船体冰载荷分析[J].振动与冲击, 2017, 36(7):226-233.
[2]	吴刚,王燕舞,张东江.中国极地破冰船总体与结构设计技术现状与展望[J].中国造船, 2020, 61(1):194-203.
[3]	薛彦卓,倪宝玉.极地船舶与浮体结构物力学问题研究综述[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2016, 37(1):36-40.
[4]	陈明,褚凤天.基于云模型和组合权重的极地科考船技术评价[J].中国造船, 2017, 58(1):193-201.
[5]	侯远杭,胡玉龙,王文全,等.船型方案优选的多目标群决策方法[J].上海交通大学学报, 2012, 46(3):385-389.
[6]	安进,徐廷学,曾翔,等.组合赋权下的装备质量状态信息融合评估方法[J].控制与决策, 2018, 33(9):1693-1698.
[7]	ZHU G N, HU J, REN H L.A Fuzzy Rough Number-Based AHP-TOPSIS for Design Concept Evaluation Under Uncertain Environments[J].Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2020, 91:1-18.
[8]	WU X L, HU F.Analysis of Ecological Carrying Capacity Using a Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J].Ecological Indicators, 2020, 113:1-13.
[9]	GUAN F, CUI W W, LI L F, et al.A Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Sensor Selection for PHM Based on Grey Clustering[J].Sensors, 2020, 20(6):1-14.
[10]	MADHUMITA S, SATIPRASAD S, ANIRBAN D, et al.Effectiveness Evaluation of Objective and Subjective Weighting Methods for Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment in Urban Context[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 541:1301-1315.
[11]	DUAN Y C, CAI Y H, WANG Z K, et al.A Novel Network Security Risk Assessment Approach by Combining Subjective and Objective Weights Under Uncertainty[J].Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(3):1-20.
[12]	HE B, CAO X Y, HUA Y C.Data Fusion-Based Sustainable Digital Twin System of Intelligent Detection Robotics[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 280:1-21.
[13]	CAO H, ZHANG J D.Cloud Model-Based Intelligent Evaluation Method in Marine Engine Room Simulator[J], IEEE Access, 2020, 8:168502-168515.
[14]	DINA M A, MAGNUS S.Evaluating Alternative Energy Carriers in Ferry Transportation Using a Stochastic Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach[J].Transportation Research Part D, 2020, 86:1-12.
[15]	ZHANG Z L, YE H R, DAN Y H, et al.Novel Method for Comprehensive Corrosion Evaluation of Grounding Device[J].IEEE Access, 2020, 8:72102-72111.
[16]	秦庭荣,丁宁,胡勤友,等.基于证据理论的船舶应急脆弱性评估[J].中国航海, 2016, 39(2):35-39.
[17]	PELORUS, HRISTOS K.The Application of the AHP-TOPSIS for Evaluating Ballast Water Treatment Systems by Ship Operators[J].Transportation Research Part D, 2017, 52:172-184.
[18]	肖青,胡豪,李晶.基于CRITIC-TOPSIS法的邮船船型选择[J].上海海事大学学报, 2018, 39(3):53-56+84.
[19]	陈继红,孟威,周康,等.基于灰关联的中国邮轮港口竞争力评估[J].应用泛函分析学报, 2016, 18(3):284-297.
[20]	郑士君,韩成敏,董建华.船舶状态综合评估模型的建立[J].中国航海, 2008(2):144-147+157.
[21]	CHEN J H, BIAN W T, WAN Z, et al.Identifying Factors Influencing Total-Loss Marine Accidents in the World:Analysis and Evaluation Based on Ship Types and Sea Regions[J].Ocean Engineering, 2019, 191:1-9.
[22]	王宗润,汤小芸.基于TOPSIS方法改进的多属性决策模型:最小化偏好反转[J/OL].控制与决策:1-10[2020-11-23].https://doi.org/10.13195/j.kzyjc.2019.0536.
[23]	中国船级社.国际海事组织防污公约2011年综合文本[M].北京:人民交通出版社, 2012:80.
[24]	International Maritime Organization.International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code)[J].Resolution MSC, 2014, 385(94).
[25]	Bureau Veritas.Rules for the Classification of Ships Operating in Polar Waters and Icebreakers[S].2017.
[26]	中国船级社.极地船舶指南[S].2016.
[27]	赵书强,汤善发.基于改进层次分析法、CRITIC法与逼近理想解排序法的输电网规划方案综合评价[J].电力自动化设备, 2019, 39(3):143-148+162.
[28]	余仁波,徐廷学,李田科,等.基于主客观权重一致的导弹保障性评价[J].四川兵工学报, 2011, 32(3):9-12.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (10) PDF downloads (2)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

General Parameter Evaluation Concerning Equipment Configuration for Polar Cruise with Combination of Multiple Methods

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content