• Guide to core journal of China
  • CSCD indexed journals
  • JST indexed journals
  • The key magazine of China technology
  • T1 level of high-quality scientific and technological journals of China Association for Science and Technology
ZHU Qinghua, HU Shenping, WU Jianjun, WANG Fagen, CHEN Yan. Inference method for overtaking-related collision risk analysis based on accident scenario inversion[J]. Navigation of China, 2023, 46(3): 29-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4653.2023.03.005
Citation: ZHU Qinghua, HU Shenping, WU Jianjun, WANG Fagen, CHEN Yan. Inference method for overtaking-related collision risk analysis based on accident scenario inversion[J]. Navigation of China, 2023, 46(3): 29-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4653.2023.03.005

Inference method for overtaking-related collision risk analysis based on accident scenario inversion

More Information
  • Received Date: April 05, 2022
  • A novel collision risk inference method based on case scenario inversion is introduced to study the evolution of the accident. A track calculation and two-dimensional interpolation algorithm is developed to invert the overtaking process and the development of collision scenario according to the dynamic information collected during the whole process of the accident. The virtually repeated process is analyzed and the evolution of collision criteria is examined. A negative exponential function is introduced to calculate the ICR(Collision Risk Index) that comprehensively indicates the degree of collision danger. A dimensionless collision risk index is defined to comprehensively represent the status of dCPA(Distance of Closest Point of Approach), tCPA(Time to Closest Point of Approach) and the parameters of both ships. A grey cloud inference model is developed. 28 samples of ship overtaking accidents are examined with the model. The following findings are interesting: in the course of ship overtaking, an accident, if happens, will develop in three stages, that is, collision risk, close situation and immediate danger; the time duration of each stage are almost the same for all the accidents examined; the PCR(Potential Collision Risks) for the three stages are 0.349 1, 0.557 5 and 0.777 1 in average respectively.
  • [1]
    陈毕伍, 沙正荣, 吴建生, 等.基于船舶领域的珠江口通航风险评估[J].大连海事大学学报, 2020, 46(1):29-38.CHEN B W, SHA Z R, WU J S, et al.Navigation risk assessment of Pearl River estuary based on ship domain[J].Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2020, 46(1):29-38.(in Chinese)
    [2]
    黄纯, 陈国伟, 柴田.IWRAP MK Ⅱ软件在长江口水域船舶碰撞和搁浅风险评估中的应用[J].中国航海, 2017, 40(1):79-82.HUANG C, CHEN G W, CHAI T.IWRAP MK II software application in ship collision and grounding risk assessment in Yangtze River estuary area[J].Navigation of China, 2017, 40(1):79-82.(in Chinese)
    [3]
    邵承谱, 朱浩纲, 等.基于AIS数据的渔业船舶碰撞风险度评估模型[J].上海船舶运输科学研究所学报, 2021, 44(1):1-5.SHAO C P, ZHU H G, et al.AIS data application in modeling of fishery vessels for collision risk assessment[J].Journal of Shanghai Ship and Shipping Research Institute, 2021, 44(1):1-5.(in Chinese)
    [4]
    YO Y, LEE J S.Evaluation of ship collision risk assessments using environmental stress and collision risk models[J].Ocean Engineering, 2019, 191(1):1-13.
    [5]
    张磊, 赵晓博, 甘浪雄, 等.船舶碰撞事故反演有限元仿真[J].中国航海, 2018, 41(1):78-83.ZHANG L, ZHAO X B, GAN L X, et al.Finite element simulation for ship collision accident investigation[J].Navigation of China, 2018, 41(1):78-83.(in Chinese)
    [6]
    LI B, PANG F W.An approach of vessel collision risk assessment based on the D-S evidence theory[J].Ocean Engineering, 2013, 74(1):16-21.
    [7]
    ABEBE M, NOH Y, SEO C, et al.Developing a ship collision risk index estimation model based on dempster-shafer theory[J].Applied Ocean Research, 2021, 113:102735.
    [8]
    ZHEN R, RIVEIRO M, JIN Y.A novel analytic framework of real-time multi-vessel collision risk assessment for maritime traffic surveillance[J].Ocean Engineering, 2017, 145(15):492-501.
    [9]
    MOU J M, TAK C, HAN L.Study on collision avoidance in busy waterways by using AIS data[J].Ocean Engineering, 2010, 37(5-6):483-490.
    [10]
    ZAMAN M B, KOBAYASHI E, WAKABAYASHI N , et al.Development of Risk Based Collision (RBC) model for tanker ship using AIS data in the malacca straits[J].Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 2015, 14:128-135.
    [11]
    LIU Z, WU Z, ZHENG Z.A novel framework for regional collision risk identification based on AIS data[J].Applied Ocean Research, 2019, 89:261-272.
    [12]
    NI A, TU N.Potential risk ship domain as a danger criterion for real-time ship collision risk evaluation[J].Ocean Engineering, 2019, 194:106610.
    [13]
    YHA B, GKP B.Collision risk assessment based on the vulnerability of marine accidents using fuzzy logic[J].International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2020, 12:541-551.
    [14]
    江行, 贾志霈, 郑海涛.基于四元船舶领域和避碰规则的碰撞危险度模型[J].船舶工程, 2020, 42(S1):379-384.JIANG X, JIA Z P, ZHANG H T.Collision risk model based on quaternion ship domain and preventing collisions regulations[J].Ship Engineering, 2020, 42(S1):379-384.(in Chinese)
    [15]
    ZAOH Y, WANG L, PENG S.A real-time collision avoidance learning system for unmanned surface vessels[J].Neuro Computing, 2016, 182:255-266.
    [16]
    CHEN P, MOU J, VAN GELDER P.Integration of individual encounter information into causation probability modelling of ship collision accidents[J].Safety Science, 2019, 120:636-651.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 张晓宇,刘春晓. 时空轨迹数据下海上船舶碰撞危险度模型. 舰船科学技术. 2024(17): 168-171 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (10) PDF downloads (1) Cited by(1)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return